London’s Backyard Bridge undertaking set to be scrapped, finds reported

0
299

London’s Garden Bridge project set to be scrapped, finds reported

Courtesy of Garden Bridge Trust

Split

Split

or

https://www.archdaily.com/868777/londons-garden-bridge-project-should-be-scrapped-report-finds

London’s troubled Garden Bridge proposal may finally have been dealt the final blow after a new report by senior Labor MP Margaret Hodge concluded that the project should be shelved now rather than risk more public money being poured into the controversial project to pump. Conceived by Thomas Heatherwick Studio in 2013 and approved by Westminster Council in December of the following year, the over £46m of public funding already poured into the project could not be recovered.

Courtesy of Garden Bridge TrustCourtesy of Garden Bridge TrustCourtesy of Garden Bridge Trust+ 9

Courtesy of Garden Bridge TrustCourtesy of Garden Bridge Trust

“What started out as an estimated £60m project will likely end up costing over £200m,” reads the report. “At the same time, the Garden Bridge Trust has lost two major donors and secured just £69m in private funding commitments, leaving a gap of at least £70m to be found for the capital investment. No new commitments have been received since August 2016.”

Originally backed by Transport for London and championed by high-profile figures such as actress Joanna Lumley and former Mayor Boris Johnson, the Garden Bridge project met early opposition from critics who believed the bridge would perform a superfluous river crossing function at its proposed site would fulfil. In addition, the bridge would only be open from 6 a.m. to midnight and could close up to 12 times a year for private events, prompting several government officials to describe the program as purely a “vanity project.”

Courtesy of Garden Bridge TrustCourtesy of Garden Bridge Trust

Further problems arose over allegations of nepotism in the competition process – although initial estimates for the Heatherwick-designed program were more than three times higher than other proposals, Transport for London’s offer was nevertheless seen as the ‘most economically advantageous’ ‘.

Because of these concerns, initial work on the bridge was put on hold in July 2016 to allow for a financial review of the project, with the current Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, announcing Hodge’s formal review of the procurement processes and their overall value for money in September of this year.

Courtesy of Garden Bridge TrustCourtesy of Garden Bridge Trust

The other two firms that entered the competition, Wilkinson Eyre and Marks Barfield, had just eight days to draft and submit plans, according to the report.

“This competition didn’t smell right from the start,” David Marks, co-director of Marks Barfield, told the BBC Predetermined.

Courtesy of Garden Bridge TrustCourtesy of Garden Bridge Trust

Hodge’s report concludes by advising the city to swallow the loss of public funds rather than move forward with plans:

“In my view, it is better for the taxpayer to accept the loss than risk the additional claims if the project goes ahead,” the report concludes. “In the current climate of sustained pressure on public spending, it is difficult to justify further public investment in the Garden Bridge.”

Courtesy of Garden Bridge TrustCourtesy of Garden Bridge Trust

Garden Bridge Trust Chairman Lord Mervyn Davies issued this response to the report’s findings:

“We are delighted that Dame Margaret has finally released her report after six months of uncertainty. We will study the report in detail and aim to meet with the mayor to discuss next steps. The Trust remains committed to bringing about the Garden Bridge, which will bring tremendous benefits to London and Britain.”

Check out the full report here, and check out the full saga of ArchDaily coverage here.

News from The Guardian, Architects’ Journal.